Search for: "North v. State" Results 7921 - 7940 of 13,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
Thursday, November 13th at 10 am: Finally, we remind you that oral arguments in USA v. al Nashiri will resume on Thursday at 10 am in the U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
A federal court in North Carolina refused to dismiss their class action under the FCRA, which alleged that Lowe’s routinely used consumer reports, but failed to provide copies or notice of the reports before taking an adverse employment action (Brown v Lowe’s Companies, Inc). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
Elsewhere in Egypt, a train traveling in the Nile Delta region north of Cairo was bombed last night. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.)) the Smedleys married in 2000 in Germany, where Mark was stationed as a member of the United States Army. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm by Cleve Clinton
Truth and Illusion in the Fracking DebateFrac(k)ing, Parr v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina 14-35Issue: Whether the government speech doctrine permits the state of North Carolina to promote its “Choose Life” message through a specialty license plate program over which it exercises complete and effective control without also offering a pro-choice specialty plate. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:46 am
By Darcy Jalandoni My colleague and friend Jay Levine was recently interviewed by HealthLeaders Media on a case we covered in a recent post (North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Eight states have conclusively adopted this position, including Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Texas.2Link to the text of the note People ex rel. [read post]