Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 7921 - 7940 of 9,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:00 pm by Tamara Piety
Today I will talk about where it is showing up, US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:27 am by Brien Roche
For instance, a decision from the United States Supreme Court would frequently be referred to as Jones v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:24 am by Anna Christensen
  The Plant Protection Act of 2000 (PPA) directs the Secretary of Agriculture (or his designee—in this case, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)) to promulgate regulations to prevent the “introduction of plant pests into the United States or the dissemination of plant pests within the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP)   Ireland New guidelines for dealing with extensions in time (Class 46)   Malta International: Malta announces tax exemption for patent royalties (IP finance)   Poland Time of bad faith in trade mark application (Class 46)   South Africa World Cup 2010: Fake shirts pour in (Afro-IP)   Spain Court elaborates on ‘trade mark families’ (Class 46)   United Kingdom Unilever threatens legal action against BNP to prevent Marmite appearing in… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm by Steven G. Pearl
(We posted on United Steel here.)The Court then spends several pages clarifying this standard. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am by admin
Condon with 437 cases  4.6% of total cases The top 10 most active panelists are all from the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Naturally, some people might try to defend this on the grounds that prosecutors won’t apply the statute as broadly as it’s written, but will instead focus just on “extreme” cyberbullying; but I think Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in last week’s United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  That list, which was appended to the government’s brief in oppostion in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:54 pm by William Morriss
About a week later, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in City of Ontario v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:04 am by David Stras
United States, 129 S. [read post]