Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 8,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2008, 12:28 pm
Oliver Bolthausen & Peter H. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
Plaintiffs Glynn Ley and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi (collectively, "Plaintiffs") appeal a district court's grant of Defendants' Visteon Corporation, Peter Pestillo, Michael Johnston, Daniel R. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Johnston v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:16 am
Not a surprise, really: a while back, Donohue turned in what might be the best performance we ever saw here, as Price Hal (Henry V) in Henry IV/V. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) If D.C. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:37 pm
Thanks to Peter Mahler and his New York Business Divorce Blog, where I read about this case. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
See Weinberg v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 2:05 am
As you may have perceived, QQ # 54 was derived from a 7th Circuit case, decided just last month, Peters v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 12:59 pm
I will recommend the following paper to those of you who can access it: “Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation;” Peter-Paul Verbeek; Science, Technology and Human Values; v 31; 2006; pp. 361-380; doi: 10.1177/0162243905285847. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
Peters Co. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 3:10 pm
In yesterday's post, I reported on Felton-Shepherd Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 9:51 am
Trimboli v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:56 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:45 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
" Unfortunately, the ruling in Christian Research Institute v. [read post]
