Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 19,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:39 am
His opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
Minnesota v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
The court then concluded that a sign consisting of a colour applied to the sole of a high-heeled shoe, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, does not consist exclusively of a ‘shape’, within the meaning of article 3(1)(e)(iii).CommentIt might not be putting it too strong to simply say that rational thought prevailed in this long-running dispute. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
Minnesota v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 4:44 am
The case is being handled by the Placer County District Attorney’s Office, which has a strong record of aggressively prosecuting DUI cases involving fatalities. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Without a thorough record, it is impossible for DeBruce to overcome the “strong presumption that counsel’s conduct [fell] within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance,” Strickland v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:14 pm
July 12, 2013) (post) and Brazil v. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 2:48 am
Several of these states took a contrary position just months ago in Apple v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
[v] N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm
They refer to an analogy that came up in a previous Apple v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
It did so in the 1997 case of Guard v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
The transaction in Kahn v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:41 pm
Here the Court makes a strong move to articulate legal rights for individuals who don't fall within the male/female binary, thus making a distinct shift from most pre-existing comparative law. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 12:00 pm
Digital Verification Systems v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
Disclaimer: I act for both claimants and defendants, including in two of the cases cited above – Monroe v Hopkins & Singh v Weayou. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
” Wolfe v. [read post]
