Search for: "Summers v. Summers" Results 7921 - 7940 of 9,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2009, 4:04 am
Well summer has finally made its way down to the fortified concrete bunker of justice, that hallowed spot by the highway where the Resplendently Robed Ones swill their free coffee and ply their shiny judicial wares.Indeed, there are only two civil opinions this week, and one is a child dependency case, so that one doesn't even really count.Still, let's take a look:Valenzuela v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm by Daniel Brown
I met the two boys when I was reporting on the community in the summer of 2006. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:17 pm
This is clear from Sarwar v Alam where the judgment of the Court of Appeal was given in 2001. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:41 am
Section I contains submissions as they relate to measurable, reportable and verifiable (MRV) support and actions; Section II contains submissions related to shared vision; Section III contains the legal aspects of proposals for an agreed outcome; Section IV contains submissions on finance; and Section V summarizes submissions on technology. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:41 am
This has resulted in layoffs, deferrals, fewer offers and now consideration about whether to have a 2010 Summer Program, and if so, at what size. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:01 pm
Only one case merits our discussion:Hutchinsion v State. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
Talk about poetic justice--Goffe sought $1 trillion in damages, enough to make tv megastar Winfrey cut back on her summer vacation plans. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:47 pm
The firm also pushed back start dates for first-year associates, until "at least" January 2010, and the 2009 summer program was a brief six weeks. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
With the kids back in school by mid-August and summer vacation still to take prior to the fall sessions, late summer litigation in the States is generally quiet. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:59 pm by Michael Fox
Putting it aside is not to impugn Justice Roberts' integrity when he made those comments, but rather to recognize that even umpires set their own strike zone.Bruce Weber had a similar thought in his article last month in the NYT, Umpires v. [read post]