Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 7921 - 7940 of 21,967
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 9:55 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The plaintiff testified that he did not notice anything wrong with the railing prior to his fall; however, he did not test the railing by shaking or rattling it. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:44 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Police conducted a blood test after the accident, which indicated that the driver’s blood alcohol content was above the legal limit. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:42 am by Ronald Mann
The plaintiffs contend, though, and the California court agreed, that Bristol-Myers’ contacts with California are sufficiently “related to” the claims of the out-of-state plaintiffs to justify exercise of specific jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:22 am by Doorey
 there are two routes that a plaintiff can follow to establish constructive dismissal, as set out in Potter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
He eventually stopped treatment with one of the doctors because his employer would not approve his MRI tests. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:23 am by Steven Cohen
Kitzes did not perform any tests or focus groups or rely on any articles on the location of warnings. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:23 am by Steven Cohen
Kitzes did not perform any tests or focus groups or rely on any articles on the location of warnings. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 8:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is a totality of the circumstances test, and the facts are typically quite involved, so much that these decisions can be lengthy and complicated, as reflected in the 14 month time period the Court of Appeals (Livingston, Leval and Carney) took to issue this decision. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:44 am by Steven Cohen
The court concludes that Marais’s opinion passes teh Daubert test. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:44 am by Steven Cohen
The court concludes that Marais’s opinion passes teh Daubert test. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:45 pm by Liz Klebaner
  The Court applied a three-part test, asking whether there is a substantial probability that (1) the challenged action will cause a decrease in supply of raw material from a particular source; (2) the plaintiff manufacturer obtains raw material from that source; and (3) will suffer economic harm from a decrease in the supply of raw material from that source. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of David M. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:32 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to produce non-public unaccused products for testing because the discovery was disproportional to the needs of the case. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:11 am by Joy Waltemath
A BNSF locomotive technician is required to test, inspect, and repair electrical components of locomotive systems, equipment, and machinery, and essential functions include the ability to safely climb on and off locomotives. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 11:29 pm by Patrick Bracher
The plaintiffs sued the defendant for the purchase price of a buffalo which died during an operation to test it for diseases as part of the sale. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Laboratory tests commissioned by MB indicated that Tantillo lemon juice contained added water, added non-fruit citric acid, and were not dervived from lemons of Italian or Sicilian descent, and MB concluded that the lime juice could not be “Sicilian” because there was no commercial lime juice exportation from Italy. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint to clarify that they were suing Dr. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” But is that true because the treatment has been “tested and disproven, or rather, is it because no study regarding its efficacy has been conducted yet, and thus, scientific literature is devoid of a conclusion? [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm by CJ Haddick
And so, the free initial consultation, long a staple of the plaintiff’s bar, has been co-opted and re-purposed for my insurance company and other corporate clients. [read post]