Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 7:54 am
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:30 pm
Dillon sought the two-level reduction in his base offense level provided in the Amendment and argued that his sentence should be further reduced under United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
Bury granted an extension of time to 15 April, but no meeting took place or was arranged by the review officer. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
I, § 8, cl. 8, meaning inventions with a practical use, see Brenner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:20 pm
All circuits have held the re-sentencing only allows the granting of the two level reduction. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:52 pm
” Kuroda v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
Minn. 2009) (discussed here), or we can take advantage of a really dumb decision by the other side, see Maestas v. [read post]
Craigslist Wins $1.3M Default Judgment Against Autoposting Facilitator -- craigslist v. Naturemarket
25 Mar 2010, 10:25 am
[Post by Venkat] craigslist, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
., but it’s been used by some foreign governments for many decades. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:17 am
See The Cupcakery, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:02 pm
Prior to the CRA, the Commission did not have an explicit grant of jurisdiction over the off-exchange spot forex markets and there was, accordingly, little regulatory oversight of certain market participants. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:05 pm
In Sonzinsky v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:08 pm
The House included similar provisions in H.R. 4173, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which passed the House on December 11. 2009.Title V, Subtitle C, Part 7 of HR 4173 would create a new grant program to provide states with the tools they need to prosecute securities fraud against seniors. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:13 pm
That level of interest in the Court is unparalleled today, except for in isolated cases like Bush v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:00 pm
The court decisions, especially at the appellate level where it counts most, give us a result but little or no guidance for future cases. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
Rather, we must conclude that, under these circumstances, as was the case in Ex parte Minor, the evidence about Waldrop’s prior conviction was presumptively prejudicial and its impact was egregious and that the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury regarding the proper use of evidence about Waldrop’s prior conviction rose to the level of plain error. [read post]
