Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 7921 - 7940 of 8,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 12:17 pm by rnahoum
The Problem In recent years, due in part to the financial crisis and high rates of unemployment caused by Wall Street shenanigans, the United States has been in a foreclosure crisis. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Wyoming Department of Revenue Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Before the applicant presented her unopposed motion under FRCP 23(e), however, the United States Supreme Court decided Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Now we need new hands to help carry the message of how valuable Bayh-Dole is to the continued health and wealth of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm by Lara
Kryoman v Glo-bots: prepare for courtroom hoedown over neon lights and copyrights. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The purpose of the board is to determine what about Facebook’s Community Standards is fair and transparent, and what isn’t. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has said facial recognition could create “mass surveillance of our public spaces, destroying any concept of privacy. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:47 am by David Rossmiller
  I saw a recent Ninth Circuit case that highlights this language: Tri-Star Theme Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
 The United States Department of Justice argued that the settlement would allow Google to unfairly take advantage of millions of "orphaned" works whose copyright owners haven't been identified, or in cases where the copyright ownership is debated. [read post]