Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 7921 - 7940 of 19,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 5:30 am
United States, those innocent victims of even the most egregious forms of medical malpractice are denied the ability to use the legal system to protect their rights. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:49 am by Law Offices of J Craig Fong
Perry places the question squarely before the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:48 am by Ilya Somin
On Saturday, I provided an overview of New Hampshire v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Moderator: Kelly Maser, United States Olympic Committee (United States) Ambush marketing: capitalizing on the excitement surrounding an event. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) USTR releases ACTA summary (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) Court of… [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
It was primarily raised by the United States, acting as amicus curiae. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm by Barry Barnett
Alien torts Does the Alien Tort Statute, which Congress passed in 1789 to allow "any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States", cover a law-of-nations violation that occurs outside the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:13 am by Farrah Nagrampa
Sachs, in which the court will determine when an entity is an “agent” of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Ocasio v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm by Kevin Healey
The Third Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals stated, The term ‘all-risk’ has been said to be somewhat misleading. [read post]