Search for: "v. JONES" Results 7921 - 7940 of 9,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The People) (Ars… [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Coverage of the case was broad with Bird & Bird, Norton Rose Fulbright, Jones Day, Penningtons and Eversheds Sutherland. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Likewise, defendant's fifth and sixth counterclaims have "no merit" because defendant failed to either rebut plaintiff's proof that the retainer agreement was legally sufficient or specify any legal theory upon which relief could potentially be granted (Ventura v Fischer, 21 Misc 3d 131[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52124[U], *2 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; see CPLR 3212 [b]). [*3] Finally, the District Court should have dismissed the seventh and eighth counterclaims… [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions On 9 May 2011, in the case of Allen v Lloyd-Jones, the NSW District Court awarded damages of Aus$65,000 to the mayor of Bega over a malicious letter sent to the media and the NSW premier by a nun. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
It is for that reason that a prof neg claim arising out of a PI claim does not qualify as a claim for personal injury for the purpose of QOCS, or indeed for any other purpose such as limitation; Jones v GR Smith & Co (8 February 1993, unreported, CA). (7) By r44.13(1)(c) QOCS does not apply to applications for pre-action disclosure. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
   B-DC: PACA claims are trust, not secured claims, so no req't (as per §506b) that claim be oversecured to get atty fees. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/JK-BK-DC-TEEL-10-4-11.pdf … B-AL: Truck lease w/ "Terminal Rental Adjustment Clause" (TRAC) is "true lease" and not lease intended as security. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HB-BK-ND-AL-CADDELL-9-29-11.pdf … B-OH:… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
  New Relists Republic of Sudan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins Rice J will hand down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC. [read post]