Search for: "Does, 1-25" Results 7941 - 7960 of 18,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
  And he just got royally fucked.Actually, he got fucked 14 years ago, on March 25, 1997. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 1:33 pm by Eliana Baer
  The position of the parent opposing payment tends to be that (1) he/she does not agree to the selection of gap year school; (2) he/she does not agree to the concept in general, even though the children were raised with the expectation; or (3) he/she does not required to pay in any event. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by The Legal Blog
The submission in order to succeed must show that granted those facts the court does not have jurisdiction as a matter of law. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:40 am by admin
  Does Does it matter where they live if they all go to the same school? [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:39 am by Meg Martin
These internal procedures are the sort of rules and regulations contemplated by § 25-1-105 and the final result of an inmate grievance is not a matter that may be appealed to the courts. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:34 am by Ted Max
On June 25, 2014, the FTC reported approval of final orders settling charges of US – EU Safe Harbor violations against the fourteen entities. [read post]
  Board Develops A New Standard In Cemex, the Board overruled Linden Lumber, and in its place, established a new standard, as follows: “an employer violates Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by refusing to recognize, upon request, a union that has been designated as Section 9(a) representative by the majority of employees in an appropriate unit unless the employer promptly files a petition pursuant to Section 9(c)(1)(B) of the Act (an RM petition) to test the… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Accordingly the recovery does not negate the inference that [plaintiff] has suffered an economic loss. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
However, the Dutch Supreme Court was unsure how to apply Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 89/104/EEC [now repealed and re-enacted as Directive 2008/95], and therefore, asked (author's translation): 1 Does the ground for refusal or invalidity in Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 89/104/EEC, as codified by Directive 2008/95 (that a shape of product trade mark cannot consist exclusively in a shape which gives a substantial value to the goods), relate to the… [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:31 am by emagraken
I also conclude that RWIC should be so joined in the circumstances of this case… [25] I conclude that the chambers judge erred in declining to apply s. 103 on the basis that the PAU does not constitute an agreement to incorporate into RWIC’s insurance policy all the terms that are required to be incorporated in a policy issued by ICBC. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:22 pm by HRWatchdog
California was No. 1 in the 2015–2016 report, and also held the No. 1 title in the 2013–2014 and 2012–2013 reports. [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
It is the administratively simplest and most straightforward way for the state government to tax a good, as it does not require valuation and as such does not require expensive administration. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
" Slip op. at 25.So what might those claims be? [read post]