Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 pm
(Justice Stevens concurrence at FN 1). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
Claim 1 of the Bilski patent application read as follows: 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Case No. 1:08-cv-819-LEK-DRH, Settled January 22, 2009In July 2008, Richard Minsky filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Linden Research and an avatar in Linden’s virtual world Second Life raising issues of virtual intellectual property rights.Minsky, an artist and reviewer involved in the art business for over 35 years who is “recognized internationally as a leader in the field of Book Art,” wanted to establish an online presence. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:05 am
There are five easy lessons that I see that s team can show all of us. if we are willing to listen.1. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
I'll discuss three reasons below:1. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am
Finally, the categorical exclusion argument is further undermined by the fact that federal law – 35 USC §273(b)(1) – explicitly contemplates the existence of at least some business method patents: Under §273(b)(1), if a patent-holder claims infringement based on a method in a patent, the alleged infringer can assert a defense of prior use. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
: 35 USC 101 offers patent protection for "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
’ (IP Whiteboard) IP Australia official fees likely to increase from 1 August 2010 (Patentology) Azerbaijan Infringement stats in Azerbaijan: bad news, or good? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Television Food Network GP (IP Whiteboard) ‘Whiskas is purple…’ (IP Whiteboard) IP Australia official fees likely to increase from 1 August 2010 (Patentology) Azerbaijan Infringement stats in Azerbaijan: bad news, or good? [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
Only the certification motion is in issue in this appeal.[16] Section 5(1) of the Class Proceedings Act provides:5. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
") Published: 6/25/2010 11:35 AM [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The fact that there may be a preferable remedy available does not mean that the damages remedy is somehow ineffective. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am
[S. 15A inserted by s. 2 of Act 61 of 2002.]The Merchandise Act defines a “trade mark” as a “trade mark as defined in section 2 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1993 (Act 194 of 1993), and includes a well-known trade mark contemplated in section 35 of that Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am
The Merchandise Act defines a “trade mark” as a “trade mark as defined in section 2 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1993 (Act 194 of 1993), and includes a well-known trade mark contemplated in section 35 of that Act. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 pm
The Merchandise Act defines a “trade mark” as a “trade mark as defined in section 2 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1993 (Act 194 of 1993), and includes a well-known trade mark contemplated in section 35 of that Act. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:44 pm
Many lawyers will perhaps ask a different question: does the police have the power to cordon off downtown Toronto. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:23 pm
The revised policy makes clear that: (1) Twitter tracks user interactions with links; and (2) Twitter uses more than just Google analytics. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:52 pm
So what does seeking the death penalty accomplish? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
Dutra takes what appears to be the highly technical point that if an offer does not contain the exact wording set out in subrule (1)(c)(iii), it does not come within the definition of an “offer to settle” within the meaning of Rule 37B(1) and, therefore, cannot attract an award of double costs. [19] Madam Justice Prowse considered both a strict and relaxed interpretation of Rule 37B(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
Id. col.1 ll.36-42. [read post]
