Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
Yorkshire-based Samuel Smith, one of the oldest English breweries still in existence, registered as a trade mark a stylised white rose device (above, right), this being both distinctive of the brewery and an allusion to its strong connection with Yorkshire, the white rose being that county's ancient emblem. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:15 pm
Read the judgment (in English) here. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Simpson, 2008 SCC 40, and Grant v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Menu: Pierre v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm
If I quit now, I can expect Jack to challenge me to say it again - but in English. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:38 am
Sir Guenter Treitel has said that Diplock LJ’s judgment in Hongkong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen “has a fair claim to being the most important judicial contribution to English contract law in the past century. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:05 am
The claimant in Deutsche Bank v Tongkah Harbour had provide a financing arrangement to the Tungkum Limited, which was a gold exploration and mining company based in Thailand. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
Instead of deciding that there should be a statutory compensation scheme backed by the state (as per a very limited English version) , the law decided that pleural plaques amounted to bodily injury. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) in Ron Matusalem & Matusa of Florida Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
Cytosport, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:16 pm
(People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
Wikipedia informs: “The Panopticon is a type of building designed by English philosopher and social theorist Jeremy Bentham in the late eighteenth century. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
In Bunt v. [read post]
