Search for: "GUESS v. GUESS" Results 7941 - 7960 of 8,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2019, 6:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The bench was an active inquisitor in the Thryv v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm by privacylawyer
In his view, this is best achieved through the established test in R v Collins, [1987] 1 SCR 265, 308. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That, in turn, led to his lawyers mounting a number of challenges in courts across the country, even reaching the Supreme Court in the case of Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:20 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
When faced with a claim of juror bias, Remmer v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
In applying the standard of meaningful representation, counsel's efforts should not be second-guessed with the clarity of hindsight to determine how the defense might have been more effective. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
  Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695, 710-11 (D.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[defined: no fault injunctions against ISPs, so I guess China’s Great Wall doesn’t count?] [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
  We "have reviewed the Guild's various claims and find them to be without merit," the judges wrote in their October 22 decision.The court's unanimous decision in the case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:01 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
No prize for guessing as such, I am of course referring to the Delhi University photocopy controversy. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Florian Mueller
I guess this passage is going to get a lot of attention from the Federal Circuit judges (maybe more than anything else in the document), who have taken great care in connection with patent-eligibility cases not to create broad exclusions through case law that U.S. [read post]