Search for: "In re Doe" Results 7941 - 7960 of 107,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2023, 9:07 pm by Bill Marler
Bill Marler The proposal that you have does, or does not, require congressional approval or buy off? [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 8:00 pm by Jason Rantanen
Hologic and In re Wingen serve as a reminder to avoid disclosing the details of an invention before they are ready to file a patent application—and if a disclosure does occur, they should remember to preserve the argument that it wasn’t actually enabling! [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 7:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
If the Supreme Court rules that it does cover these algorithms, Google has not broken the law. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:46 pm by Russell Knight
Co., 853 NE 2d 94 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 1st Div. 2006 The same goes for federal court decisions…even if they’re in Illinois. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 10:00 am by Bill Marler
Skeptics roll their eyes and point out there’s an element of self-promotion to almost everything Marler does. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 11:25 am
  Nor does a negligence claim against the inspector appear promising. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 7:19 am by Andrew Flusche
  Your poor performance on the SFST does not mean you are automatically guilty. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 5:11 am by SHG
But we’re in a moment of transition. [read post]
  Further, in the event of such changes to the transfers, the company must complete a new data protection impact assessment (“DPIA”) and re-file it with the CAC (Measures, Article 8). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm
None of this is inherently bad, but it does work to enhance  the Chinese position in the world, at least as to its form and the timing of its release. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:14 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Question: If a document is not considered acceptable, and the attorney re-submits the requested documents, on average, how long does the NVC take to review the new evidence? [read post]