Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 7941 - 7960 of 16,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 7:31 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Petitioner didn’t produce evidence of any sales or transport of DIP-IT products. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:20 pm by James Kachmar
In analyzing these factors, the Ninth Circuit found that it could not conclude as a matter of law that the jury erred in finding a Lanham Act violation for false endorsement. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:41 am
So congratulations go to fellow Kat Eleonora,now that her article "Just a Matter of Laugh? [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:51 am by SHG
They have no reason to be interested in such matters as civil forfeiture until it touches their lives. [read post]
Overview 2013 marked the beginning of major changes in the estate planning landscape. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:28 am by David M. McLain
It also creates easier and speedier methods for dispute resolution, short of taking the matter to court. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:01 am by SHG
  No matter how sweet the plea, he should have taken a stand for the truth, if truth it was. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:53 am
Section 2(e)(5) of the Lanham Act bars registration of a proposed mark that “comprises any matter that, as a whole, is functional. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am by Wes Anderson
Under “dilution by tarnishment,” the third party associates the famous mark with inappropriate or unflattering subject matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am by INFORRM
” McClintock submitted that defamation was a matter of impression, and the “overwhelming impression” was that his client is corrupt. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:39 am by SHG
  That’s a trick question, because it really doesn’t matter. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:27 pm by Jeff Gamso
 But what matters is what follows.This is what led me to that moment: the story I had lived and told. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 pm
Class 46's Fidel Porcuna brings news of a Spanish ruling on likelihood of confusion in a trade mark case where Kelloggs established that the fact that the applicant for a similar mark is a private label business doesn't vitiate the risk that consumers will be confused. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Although they are unprotectable by themselves -- that is, you can't stop others from using .com --  a mark that combines these elements with a protectable term is registrable if it is unique to a Internet business.More than an address. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am by SHG
Unlike others, like me or Mark Bennett, whom the doyennes of revenge porn refuse to acknowledge because we don’t sufficiently moderate our criticism to suit their delicate sensibilities, Lee comes at the problem with legit feminist cred and a kinder, softer voice. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:54 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Further, the Board noted that “FINCA,” which translates to “VINEYARD,” is highly descriptive in its association with wine and “[i]t is well-settled that disclaimed, descriptive matter may have less significance in likelihood of confusion determinations. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
  Among other matters, it includes some relevant innovations as regards pharma patent’s compulsory licences, Katfriend Mark Summerfield explains.* "Are you sitting comfortably ...? [read post]