Search for: "People v Denis"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 15,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 3:02 am
As the Supreme Court recently said in B&B Hardware v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
Circuit disagreed and therefore denied his petition for review. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:34 am
But, as B&B v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
NZ global mode ISPs to be sued for copyright infringement http://t.co/zcaAS2IQMu -> Pirate Bay Co-Founder Unable To Experience The Joys Of NES Behind Bars http://t.co/SBGsRgVgFl -> Record Labels Accuse YouTube Of Causing Them To Lose Money http://t.co/mqHp07gxzz -> HBO Criticizes Periscope Over 'Game of Thrones' Live Streams, Issues Take-Down Notices http://t.co/CMoO1BtgMi -> Proposed new Australia website blocking powers for the Federal Court http://t.co/95w81zyKD2 -> World… [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:06 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:21 am
Mikel v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:32 am
Byrd v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
Desmond said UKIP was a party for “good, ordinary British people”. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:13 am
In Eveland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
The father then filed a motion to set a hearing on standing, which was denied by the trial court. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
In Velasquez v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
What many people may not be aware of is that if an individual has registered with the Telephone Preference Service, these calls are unlawful and the company responsible may be fined. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
(See People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
Section 230 * California SB 1027, Purporting to make mugshot websites illegal. * The Texas Supreme Court denied certiorari in the Toups v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:42 am
Mattocks v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal,… [read post]
