Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 178,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 7:03 am
On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that JetStream should have been precluded from testifying about the supervisor’s possible recommendations. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Thereafter, Plaintiff and his wife sued Plaintiff’s employer, as well as other companies involved in Plaintiff’ work on the day he fell. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 5:47 pm
Thus, if a person with information regarding the plaintiff’s treatment and symptoms refuses to testify, it can frustrate the plaintiff’s attempts to obtain relevant information. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 7:12 am
Following her suspension, plaintiff was fired.The majority (Menashi and Walker) says that even under the more plaintiff-friendly New York City Human Rights Law, plaintiff has failed to allege that Delta's "own negligence permitted or facilitated the passenger's alleged discriminatory conduct" because the single comment was not sufficiently egregious or severe to create a hostile work environment, and "the complaint's… [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
At issue in the case is the state's second attempt to execute plaintiff. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 1:57 pm
.) -- finding that: (1) Bureau of Indian Affairs conducted adequate search for records concerning plaintiff and properly redacted third-party information pursuant to Exemptions 6 and 7(C), issues that plaintiff conceded; (2) agency’s post-litigation release of records did not necessarily entitle plaintiff to litigation costs, because agency explained that end of post-conviction proceedings triggered release of records; (3) even if plaintiff were… [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 10:01 pm
Parrish granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs’ for a finding of spoliation and for sanctions, granting the plaintiffs’ request for sanctions for failing to preserve more of the video surveillance footage of the plaintiff’s trip and fall accident, but denied the plaintiffs’ request for sanctions for failing to preserve training records and the store’s safety statistics...Read the whole entry... [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the court erred by (1) awarding $43,158.65 from the plaintiff’s retirement account to the defendant, (2) awarding alimony to the defendant, while not awarding alimony to the plaintiff, (3) awarding the defendant certain real property in Jamaica, and (4) awarding attorney’s fees to the defendant. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:00 pm
Plaintiff's claim was based on a one page unsolicited advertisement sent by Atlas to plaintiff's fax machine. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:09 am
Neundorf ("The plaintiff...appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his complaint against the defendants...doing business as Go2Guys, and Go2Dump, LLC (Go2Dump). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:57 am
The district court agreed with plaintiff's position. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:00 pm
Plaintiff's claim was based on a one page unsolicited advertisement sent by Atlas to plaintiff's fax machine. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Central to the district court’s ruling is the principle that the plaintiff is “master of his complaint” and can plead to avoid federal jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Central to the district court’s ruling is the principle that the plaintiff is “master of his complaint” and can plead to avoid federal jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Central to the district court’s ruling is the principle that the plaintiff is “master of his complaint” and can plead to avoid federal jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Central to the district court’s ruling is the principle that the plaintiff is “master of his complaint” and can plead to avoid federal jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:08 am
Barton sent an e-mail to both attorneys, as well as the named partners at Jackier Gould, alerting them that he was an existing client of the firm and that Jacobs’s adverse representation of plaintiffs was an impermissible conflict of interest, contrary to MRPC 1.7. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
District Court for the District of Delaware’s recent decision in Scott v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:26 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:23 am
Accordingly, the court denied plaintiff’s motion to remand. [read post]
