Search for: "State v West" Results 7941 - 7960 of 9,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 4:29 am
The high court is scheduled to consider whether to take up the case, Dupuy v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
On 14 July 2023, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Chinese state broadcaster’s international division, China Global Television Network (CGTN), against a £125,000 fine handed down by Ofcom, Star China Media Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Office of Communications [2023] EWCA Civ 843. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:29 pm
Suffices it to make reference to a recent judgment of this Court in the case of State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 5:00 am by Cori Crider
In the U.K., rendition has been unlawful since at least 2000 (R v Mullen). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Zack Bluestone
  But it also shows Hanoi’s desire to engage with other Asian powers and the West. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:14 am by Quinta Jurecic
Circuit reversed a lower court's judgment this morning in Obama v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Woo, Fenwick & West, Palo Alto, California, for defendant-appellant. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, they say, the debt-relief program violates the “major questions doctrine,” a principle of statutory interpretation at the center of last term’s ruling in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
  This approach is both profound and profoundly relevant to the actual state of contemporary regulatory governance in which states remain powerful but not the singular regulatory actors within the structures of global production. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Jneid v West Australian Newspapers [2015] WASC 68, Kenneth Martin J dismissed an application by the defendant newspaper to strike out Chase Level 1 imputations based on separate readings of the front page and inside pages of he newspaper. [read post]