Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 19,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 9:19 am
Then, in Iancu v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:05 am
See The Cookie Department, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
” TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm
CTB, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
Conduct, 45 AD3d 927, 929 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 701 [2008]; Matter of Ostad v New York State Dept. of Health, 40 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Corines v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in Cameron v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 12:18 am
Now, thanks to the recent Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
In 'Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d'auteur' , GuestKat Antonella Gentile offers a post on the decision in Zervos v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
In McLane v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
"Public policy in New York favors arbitral resolution of public sector labor disputes" (Matter of County of Nassau v Detectives Assn., Inc. of the Police Dept. of Nassau County, 188 AD3d 1049, 1050 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of City of Long Beach v Civil Serv. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm
(OI, v.2, 330). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
"Public policy in New York favors arbitral resolution of public sector labor disputes" (Matter of County of Nassau v Detectives Assn., Inc. of the Police Dept. of Nassau County, 188 AD3d 1049, 1050 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of City of Long Beach v Civil Serv. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
App. 1986).Louisiana: Marks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
I write this article on the Aristotelean premise that: ‘It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it’. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:38 pm
A little more than a year ago, we blogged on the reported Appellate Division Case, Tannen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
