Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am
But words are fleeting and inherently ambiguous. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 5:50 pm
The legal issue involves the meaning of four words in the ACA statute, which authorize tax benefits for individuals who purchase health insurance in exchanges “established by the State. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:45 am
The Federal Circuit, in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:13 am
The district court dismissed her complaints for failure to state grounds for relief and for statute of limitations reasons. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:32 pm
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is therefore vacated as moot.The case, U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm
” West v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
There is no such express wording in section 2(3). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:09 am
In other words, the focus is on prejudice resulting from uneven access to information [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
In other words, whether the federal court was bound to accept this conclusion. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:14 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
26 May 2007, 10:56 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
United States Supreme Court I am just about out of ways to creatively announce that the United States Supreme Court has once again had a decision issue day come and go without issuing a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
” It held “only that it is not appropriate when the accused infringer has used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods—in other words, has used a trademark as a trademark. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 4:28 pm
This point was recently driven home in the June, 2014 Miami, Florida case, United States v. [read post]
