Search for: "True the Vote" Results 7941 - 7960 of 11,936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2011, 10:40 am by Mike Underwood
In the Ohio General Election on Tuesday, Ohioans voted by a margin of 61% to 39% to repeal Senate Bill 5. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Shareholder activists therefore began using Rule 14a-8 to put forward bylaw amendments mandating true majority voting. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:30 pm
  Well, if that was ever true, it's not the case now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:30 pm by Lovechilde
  (See, e.g., Onek's the One, A True Criminal Justice Reformer.) [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:54 am by Lawrence Solum
” This is a position of power and influence, as any majority coalition must count on Justice Kennedy’s vote; but more importantly, it is also a position of true independence. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:32 pm by John Day
 Second, the exact opposite it true. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am by Orin Kerr
The votes were hard to count, but if you had to summarize a reaction of the Court as a whole, I would say that the Justices were looking to find a principle to regulate GPS surveillance but unconvinced (at least as of the argument) that there was a legal way to get there without opening up a Pandora’s Box of unsettling lots of long settled practices.2) The Justice who most clearly showed his cards was Justice Scalia. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:06 am by Alex Aldridge
But the essence of my slightly sensationalised opening sentence is true: no dinners, no qualification. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by SOIssues
Although they expected to find that most offenders were living in rural areas, where schools and playgrounds are more widely dispersed, they found that the opposite was true. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:27 am by SHG
Vote and serve on juries. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm by Leo Katz, guest-blogging
But let me try to give more of a glimpse of how the analogy works.Killer amendments illustrate a ubiquitous feature of voting rules: a kind of context dependence of choices. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
  When questioned by the judge, the jury’s forewoman indicated that the jurors had voted unanimously against the capital and first-degree murder charges; they were divided on the manslaughter charge and did not vote on the negligent homicide charge. [read post]