Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 7941 - 7960 of 32,498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2019, 7:31 pm by Josh Blackman
From the complaint: AB 5 violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the Contracts Clause of Article I of the United States Constitution, as well as the Equal Protection Clause, Inalienable Rights Clause, Due Process Clause, Baby Ninth Amendment, and Contracts Clause of the California Constitution. 1. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm by Guest
By 1941, the pro-New Deal Court took this line, saying in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:00 am by Edith Roberts
In January 2010, the court ruled 5-4 in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) stated that the redacted report contained “disturbing evidence that President Trump engaged in obstruction of justice. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Peter S. Margulies
Led by Harold Koh of Yale and Michael Ratner of CCR, clinical law students and lawyers worked with immigration officials to secure entry to the United States for clients whom the United States had detained, including some clients who had serious health needs such as HIV-positive status. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
A young lawyer named John Roberts spearheaded this effort, so it is no surprise that, as chief justice of the United States, he has helped enshrine this warped conception of the FAA into law. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:08 am by Kenneth Propp
Today, more than 5,000 companies, European as well as American, rely on Privacy Shield as the legal basis for their data exports to the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]