Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 7941 - 7960 of 22,872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Katrina Eiland
The United States has made a commitment — by law and by treaty — to protect people who come to this country fleeing persecution. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:36 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of VirginiaOpinion Date: 3/13/12Cite: Western Industries-North, LLP v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
I have no reason to believe that federal judges will be better at this than state legislatures; and state legislatures have the great advantages of doing harm in a more circumscribed area, of being able to correct their mistakes in a flash, and of being removable by the people. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
” In its introduction to the report, the UNEP website states that “combating climate change will be a central peace policy of the 21st century. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Although the taxing power may not be used to impose “punishment for an unlawful act,” United States v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
For example, in Chester, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2923, a prisoner claimed that his rights had been breached as prisoners in the UK are barred from voting in elections. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
A recent case illustrates this point.On November 15, the United States Court of Appeals handed down its opinion in Moneygram International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by SHG
On the flip side, shouldn’t we want to know how many people are living in the United States unlawfully? [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm by Venkat
From what I can tell, in those seizure actions, the courts issued an order (also ex parte) requiring a change in the DNS information which meant that people trying to access the domain names would now be directed to the following message: [This] domain name [has] been seized by ICE - Homeland Security Investigations, pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States Court. [read post]