Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 60,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
The 6th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:55 am
Addressing another variation concerning the individual's attaining tenure in his or her position, in Yastion v Mills, 229 AD2 775, the Appellate Division held that a teacher may work on a year-to-year contractual basis and never acquire tenure even after three years of continuous service. [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:28 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:31 pm
Shergill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am
In Vance, an African American woman (Maetta Vance) claimed that a white Ball State University employee (Saundra Davis) created a racially hostile work environment in violation of Title VII. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
” Brief for the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Contra, EEOC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:12 am
Last year, we reported on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
This order shall not apply to work-related, publicly available information such as title, salary, and dates of employment. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
In C.F. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 8:46 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:40 pm
USA v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:09 am
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html Kitras v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 4:10 am
In F.F. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:07 am
* David Boies thinks the Supreme Court doesn't want a Bush v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm
The complaint (full text) in Burma Task Force v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:00 pm
On May 15, the Mississippi Supreme Court, in Christmas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 8:31 pm
Patents In the United States, PatentlyO reported that Apotex Inc. recently issued a petition for writ of certiorari in the case of Apotex Inc. v Cephalon, Inc., asking the Supreme Court to revisit motivation to combine, obvious to try and whether the non-obvious contribution needs to be an improvement over the prior art. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:00 am
This entry was authored by MGKF Summer Associate Karina ZakarianOn June 25, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in a case of first impression, vacated the United States District Court for the District of Maryland’s holding in 68th Street Site Work Group v. [read post]
