Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 7961 - 7980 of 14,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The rule became effective on March 4, 2002 (see 22 NYCRR 1215.1 [a]; Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP v Zelmanovitch, 11 Misc 3d 1090[A] [2006]), approximately seven weeks before Ganea retained Rubenstein for the guardianship matter underlying this appeal. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm by Marta Requejo
 Tai-Heng Cheng [Oxford University Press, New York. (2012), ISBN: 978-0-19-537017-1, by Chester Brown   Related posts: Second Issue of 2012′s ICLQ La Ley-Unión Europea, July 2012 Third Issue of 2011′s ICLQ [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Barry Friedman
”  Front and center in Bickel’s critique was Brown v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  To be sure, Bickel was more than willing  to defend Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by Viking
Brown, 669 F.3d 10, 18 & n.12 (1st Cir. 2012) (citing Wikipedia for its definition of "sovereign citizen movement," one of a criminal defendant’s "atypical legal beliefs"), Murdock v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:07 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
In People v Brown, the Michigan Supreme Court held that, in order for a plea to be voluntary and in compliance with MCR 6.302(B)(2), the trial court must apprise a defendant of his maximum possible sentence, including enhancements, before accepting the defendant’s guilty plea. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:09 am
Constitutional provisions are “presumptively self-executing” as demonstrated in Brown v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:42 am by Rachel Sachs
Coverage of the upcoming Term continues to focus on Fisher v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 669 F.3d 10, 18 & n.12 (1st Cir. 2012) (citing Wikipedia for its definition of “sovereign citizen movement,” one of a criminal defendant’s “atypical legal beliefs”), Murdock v. [read post]