Search for: "Best v. Best" Results 7961 - 7980 of 41,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Judges engage in “justificatory ascent” in order to properly discern those principles of political morality (embodied in the Constitution) that best “fit and justify” the relevant sources. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
For example, in Jackson v Jackson, 2008 CanLii 3222 (ON SC), in the context of a high conflict dispute, Justice Murray held that a good lawyer will “attempt to minimize conflict while achieving appropriate results for their clients informed by the applicable legal principles including, the best interests of the children” (at para 11). [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am by Rachel Mumby (Bristows)
Floyd LJ implicitly disagrees with this approach when he notes that “the court must do the best it can on the available written evidence. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:05 am by Kevin Kaufman
Increasing the CTC, EITC, and CDCTC as a short-term economic policy response measure would not be the best use of forgone federal revenue. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 6:05 am by Eugene Volokh
["Defendant's Yelp post about plaintiff is reasonably and best understood to be, simply, name-calling. [read post]