Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 8,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
Concurrence: One of these days we should resolve what, if anything, is left of Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:21 am
Citing its own February 2010 opinion in Litwin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
In fact, this is exactly what happened to the interior designer in Tanya M Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 3:01 am
Last week’s decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Quadrozzi v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
(a) and the contents of the affidavit are derived from section 199 of the Civil Practice Act and rules 35 and 37 of the Rules of Civil Practice to the extent of eliminating an arbitrary limitation that the individual is not worth $300 in cash or available property besides the wearing apparel and furniture necessary for one's self and family and replacing same with the requirement that the affidavit set forth 'the amount and sources of his income' and list 'his property… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Bill 1X 26; see also Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Supreme Court in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
Weiner writes: [C]ontrary to Professor Adler’s claim, when Congress referred in the ACA to insurance exchanges (as opposed to, say, exchanges of information or cash), it did not use the term “exchange” to mean one thing in one place and something else in another. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:07 am
" Jian Zhang v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm
., p. 193, under the following provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“the Act”), as amended: (i) Sections 104 (a), (b), and (c)(4) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 9604 (a), (b), and (c)(4)), with respect to removal and remedial actions in the event of release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant into the environment; (ii) Sections 104(e)-(h) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 9604(e)-(h)), with respect to… [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:02 pm
Inc. v Vigilant Insurance (discussed here) held, in reliance on the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:09 am
Schweitzer in JPS Partners v Binn, 2014 NY Slip Op 31204(U) [Sup Ct, NY County May 6, 2014], came at the behest of a 1.93% investor in the parent company, a New York limited liability company known as Binn and Partners, LLC, controlled by its sole managing member, Moreton Binn. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:45 am
” Dunn v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
"[V]ery bad…for the law firms that pay them, for the associates who receive them, for the clients who foot the bill for them, and for the society we serve. . . the higher salaries are wasted dollars. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 4:59 pm
V. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:37 pm
In Kahn v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
