Search for: "Head v State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 14,434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Demers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:20 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Their cabinet resolved to seek the Secretary of State’s approval which was forthcoming. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Their cabinet resolved to seek the Secretary of State’s approval which was forthcoming. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
Touby cited and distinguished an earlier case—United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
Rule 16(a)'s various provisions are grouped under a heading that speaks to the `Government's Disclosure,’ while Rule 16(b) lists the `Defendant's Disclosure. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:54 pm
Although one of the experts stated that the 2-10 mg range would be "in play" for intravenous administration, that fell short of disclosing that this range was suitable for treating osteoporosis by intravenous administration. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
But if you ran for Vice President of the United States, or if you are an attorney volunteering to be the talking head legal analyst on a cable show, you ought to know that the issue of free speech applies to the government, not a private cable television channel. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
(Canada) v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:29 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:30 am
However, more recent rulings, including Alden v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:44 pm
Belimo Automation v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:56 am
Today we report that this latter issue may be headed back to the Third Circuit yet again.Yesterday, the court in A.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:06 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged before about United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
For heads of state, the legal entitlement to immunity under both domestic and international precedents currently follows as a matter of course from the status determination – but even this law for heads of state could change and develop as it has for state immunity itself. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court has decided Kansas v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
Merrill Lynch, 672 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 2012), is a head-scratcher in the post-Wal-Mart world. [read post]
