Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 7961 - 7980
of 42,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm
Miller, Molly C. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:44 am
Although the Court did not address this issue, the conclusions of the Advocate General nonetheless provided some interesting food for thought. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:27 pm
Appropriate legal basis for facial recognition must be examined in detail Apart from consent, which here did not satisfy the criteria of free and informed consent, the controller could have identified its legitimate interest as the legal basis. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:27 pm
Appropriate legal basis for facial recognition must be examined in detail Apart from consent, which here did not satisfy the criteria of free and informed consent, the controller could have identified its legitimate interest as the legal basis. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
Other views on C-29 and breach notification? [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:48 pm
Hopt and Patrick C. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently addressed an issue of importance to directors of companies as well as those interested in corporate litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
§ 1391(c). [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:21 pm
Still reading, but it looks quite interesting so far! [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:13 pm
The Trademark Act Sections 13 and 43(c) (15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
The Connecticut Supreme Court recently held that the University's databases of benefactors, season ticket holders, and others interested in University programs and departments were exempted from a FOIA request on the grounds that the databases were "trade secrets" under the state's FOIA disclosure exemption. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:49 pm
§ 3161(c)(1). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
These are the report’s few bright spots—if one can call a C a bright spot. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:56 am
The Court must decide based on the child’s interest.... [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
It follows that, subject to the exceptions and limitations laid down exhaustively in Article 5 of the directive, any use of such protected subject matter by a third party without such prior consent must be regarded as infringing the holder’s rights (see, to that effect, judgments of 16 November 2016, Soulier and Doke, C‑301/15, EU:C:2016:878, paragraphs 33 and 34, and of 7 August 2018, Renckhoff, C‑161/17, EU:C:2018:634, paragraph 29 and the case-law cited). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
Mark commented that the CJEU has attempted to balance these interests but this has resulted in decisions that have (at times!) [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:23 am
I expect that between 2019 and now, there has been a lot of consultation and lobbying going on behind the scenes that resulted in the few changes between C-11 and C-27. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
by Michael C. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:45 am
C. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 6:58 am
(c) Section 6(a) of Executive Order 13780 directed a review to strengthen the vetting process for the USRAP. [read post]
