Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 7961 - 7980 of 18,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am by Rory Little
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:39 pm
 Justice Finch, as he then was, in Frolek v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:07 pm by Alex R. McQuade
It’s like we’re in a state of war. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
At least Justice Thomas and Justice Alito dissented. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
Either alternative is but an act of blind justice which the court cannot and will not allow. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 8:28 am by Kirk Jenkins
This morning, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Jones v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Today’s opinion in In re United States of America/United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
Indeed, the First Circuit may revisit that issue in the pending Small Justice v. [read post]