Search for: "J. A. C."
Results 7961 - 7980
of 19,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
Nieves, 383 Md. 573, 861 A. 2d 62, 70 (Md. 2004) (citing William J. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
See Henderson, 536 F.3d at 781 (citing Randolph, 547 U.S. at 127 (Breyer, J., concurring)). [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:13 am
Ortega, supra at 729-732 (732-748 (II) (Blackmun, J., dissenting). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 12:20 am
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting), in a party atmosphere or otherwise. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Ct. at 1175 (O'Connor, J., dissenting, joined by Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens, JJ.). [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:19 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 360 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
Thomas, 304 F.3d at 582 (questioning whether verbally ordering the tenants to leave and escorting them out was a seizure of the residence where the officers did not take physical possession of the property) (Gilman, J., writing for the court on this point separately from the lead opinion). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:45 am
Circuit (Sentelle, J.) therefore dismissed the mandamus petition as moot (rejecting petitioner’s argument that this was mere “voluntary cessation” on the government’s part), as well as for lack of ripeness and standing. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:55 am
" 225 F.3d at 618 (Batchelder, J., dissenting). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
Massey, 461 F.3d 177, 180 (2d Cir. 2006) (Miner, J. concurring) (finding the "waiver" signed by parolees authorizing searches in New York to be, "for all practical purposes, indistinguishable from the 'waiver' apparently signed in Samson in the form prescribed by California law"); United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:21 pm
Mistler, 590 Pa. 390, 411, 912 A.2d 1265, 1277 (2006) (Eakin, J., dissenting) (quoting Berkemer v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 429 (1976) (Powell, J., concurring)). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 750-51 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring in the judgment), because the "distinctive configuration of [such] container[s] proclaims [their] contents; [consequently,] the contents cannot fairly be said to have been removed from a searching officer's view," Robbins, 453 U.S. at 427. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:07 am
Id. at 642-44 (plurality opinion); id. at 645 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment). [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:06 pm
The Fifth Circuit recently declined to decide whether that statement in the Verdugo-Urquidez opinion was controlling law, given the statement in Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion: "If the search had occurred in a residence within the United States, I have little doubt that the full protections of the Fourth Amendment would apply," Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. at 278 (Kennedy, J., concurring). [read post]
31 May 2008, 7:37 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 41 (2001) (Stevens, J., dissenting). [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
June 25, 2007) (Guyton, J.) [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
Ed. 2d 530 (1984) (O'Connor, J., concurring). [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 8:23 am
Ed. 2d 905 (2004) (O'Connor, J., concurring in part)). [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 4:17 am
Ed. 2d at 794 (Fortas, J., concurring)). [read post]
