Search for: "J. C." Results 7961 - 7980 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2011, 10:11 am by LawDiva
Quinn J. in his ruling referred to “the roulette of family law”. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 9:57 am
Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm 'n, 16 F. 3d 1455, 1463 (6th Cir. 1994) (Batchelder, J., concurring), quoting Marshall v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 7:10 am
Gill, 280 F.3d 923, 932-33 (9th Cir. 2002) (Gould, J., concurring) ("Investigators may inspect mail as they wish without any Fourth Amendment curtailment, so long as the inspection does not amount to a 'search,' and so long as it is conducted quickly enough so that it does not become a seizure by significantly delaying the date of delivery. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:07 pm
” Id. at 964 (Alito, J., concurring) (citing Knotts, 460 U.S. at 281–82). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
"), with Carter, 525 U.S. at 99 (Kennedy, J., concurring) ("The Fourth Amendment protects '[t]he right of the people to be secure in their ... houses,' and it is beyond dispute that the home is entitled to special protection as the center of the private lives of our people. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:32 am
Redmon, 138 F.3d 1109, 1131 (7th Cir. 1998) (Posner, J., dissenting) (collecting cases). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
See Henderson, 536 F.3d at 781 (citing Randolph, 547 U.S. at 127 (Breyer, J., concurring)). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 12:20 am
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting), in a party atmosphere or otherwise. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Ct. at 1175 (O'Connor, J., dissenting, joined by Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens, JJ.). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
Thomas, 304 F.3d at 582 (questioning whether verbally ordering the tenants to leave and escorting them out was a seizure of the residence where the officers did not take physical possession of the property) (Gilman, J., writing for the court on this point separately from the lead opinion). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:45 am by Hyland Hunt
Circuit (Sentelle, J.) therefore dismissed the mandamus petition as moot (rejecting petitioner’s argument that this was mere “voluntary cessation” on the government’s part), as well as for lack of ripeness and standing. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
Massey, 461 F.3d 177, 180 (2d Cir. 2006) (Miner, J. concurring) (finding the "waiver" signed by parolees authorizing searches in New York to be, "for all practical purposes, indistinguishable from the 'waiver' apparently signed in Samson in the form prescribed by California law"); United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:21 pm
Mistler, 590 Pa. 390, 411, 912 A.2d 1265, 1277 (2006) (Eakin, J., dissenting) (quoting Berkemer v. [read post]