Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
The United States Supreme Court has stated that qualified immunity is the norm, absolute immunity is the exception.2 Should that immunity disappear when, in their official capacities as child protection workers, they make knowingly inaccurate or false statements which result in the wrongful removal of a child? [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
The state argues that Thomas’ defense counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue the jurors’ statements in light of those countervailing factors. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
Dec. 12, 2016) (Statement of Interest)) and through consent decrees (see Nat’l Fed. of the Blind and United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm
Pierce v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesHiQ Labs v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Minow, Martha. 1998. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm
United States, No. 9:22-CV-81294-AMC (S.D. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
The United States of America argues, as an intervenor, that the PLCAA is constitutional. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
See Franks v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:25 am
” Decisions this Week United StatesG.W. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:41 pm
Texas DOT v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Save Tara v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Caputo, 517 F.3d 935 (7th Cir. 2008), but it’s dictum.It’s not all sweetness and light though, as the district court decision being appealed in Caronia demonstrates, United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
This criticism is closely related to similar complaints about the Court’s campaign finance rulings, especially Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
