Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 7961 - 7980 of 45,552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
Introduction In 1998, Bill Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a sweeping overhaul of U.S. copyright law notionally designed to update the system for the digital era. [read post]
The approach taken by the Court was to consider and answer three key questions (most recently applied in Specsavers v Asda Stores Ltd (No 2) [2012] EWCA Civ 494): Which party won the case? [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:02 am by Jan von Hein
As to the latter, the article argues that there is neither a contradiction to the ECJ’s previous decision in Google v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
  We know a fair piece more about these things these days; though, admittedly, it's still a difficult area, particularly when attempting to draw a somewhat bright-line age-based rule. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am by Steven F. Huefner
Harris, both in 2017) have considered the extent to which a fear of Section 2 liability can justify drawing district lines primarily on the basis of race, when a separate line of Supreme Court jurisprudence (beginning with Shaw v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:23 pm by MEL
One of the most significant cases decided in Ontario last year was Cormier v. 1772887 Ontario Limited (St. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As a general matter, the cases tend to fall into one of three categories: (1) lawsuits against companies that experienced a COVID outbreak in one of its facilities (such as, for example, cruise ship lines and private prison systems); (2) lawsuits against companies that made public statements suggesting the companies could profit from the pandemic (such as vaccine development companies, as well as manufacturers of personal protective equipment or diagnostic tests); and (3) companies… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
In a particularly egregious case, the administration rearranged the line of succession in the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:34 am by Nick Austin and Mike Adamson
Whether this will be an end to the controversy remains to be seen, but today’s judgment is the first to consider the issue, and grapple with the difficulties of previous decisions dating back to Reidar v Arcos in 1927, in this level of detail. [read post]