Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 119,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2018, 5:48 am
We defend individuals accused of crimes in all New Jersey state and municipal courts, the New York State criminal courts in New York City, and all federal district courts in New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am
In the absence of express words, the extraterritorial application of legislation may be implied but there is a high threshold to overcome before any such implication. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am
When deciding on applicants to accept into a university, Texas has employed the ‘Top 10%’ state law. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
Acknowledging that vessels may be taxed based on their market value, Polar Tankers claimed that the City's taxing authority was limited by the nondiscrimination principle developed by the Court in Transportation Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:16 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:00 am
The court stated that the analysis for general jurisdiction is whether “corporation is essentially ‘at home’ in the forum state. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:00 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
” Faculty Senate of Florida International University, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
United States), a “State may constitutionally withdraw the authority of state officers to enforce federal law. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
Huff, May 20, 2016, Indiana Court of Appeals More Blog Entries: Andrick v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
Huff, May 20, 2016, Indiana Court of Appeals More Blog Entries: Andrick v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Court overrules not only Roe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:07 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
In Janus v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:53 am
" State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 11:45 pm
See Dudnikov v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:29 am
Citing reduced employment opportunities, the defendant in United States v. [read post]