Search for: "People v Denis" Results 7961 - 7980 of 15,967
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Anonymous, 286 AD2d 585, 586, lv denied 97 NY2d 611 [over $150,000 child support]; with Kosovsky v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by David Gans
”  Jack argues that the back and forth in these briefs, and particularly the agreement that Romer v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Excluding a class of people from that institution, therefore, can hardly be considered rational unless it furthers some substantial goal of the state. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Bilkis
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(See People v Casey, supra; see also People v Miles, 64 NY2d 731 [1984] [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:11 am by Stephen Bilkis
Page 1 2008 NY Slip Op 50318(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The Court denied Wilcox’s petition on February 23. [read post]