Search for: "People v. Herring" Results 7961 - 7980 of 23,562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Whilst she was unconscious he raped her vaginally and anally, and stole her hand-bag. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
  All of this cooperation is to be undertaken at the state to state level--no people to people focus here (Ibid., Art. 4). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's a quick summary of the case, from the intermediate appellate court decision: [E]ach plaintiff alleges that defendants violated her right to privacy under New York Civil Rights Law § 51 by misappropriating her likeness for use in the video game "Grand Theft Auto V. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R. v Butler, 2017 CanLII 86418 (NL PC) [19] There can be coincidental meetings of people, especially in small towns: see for example R. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Despite her retirement, that fight is still not hers to fight. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
RH and her husband used one room. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by ASAD KHAN
But sadly, along with her family members, Layali is classified as a failed asylum seeker. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Her Ladyship judged that EU law does not apply when a member state treated some people within its jurisdiction less favourably than others. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
  One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:26 am by Steve Lubet
In other words, a faculty member can be disciplined for bigoted speech within the course of his or her academic or related work, but not for purely "extramural" speech. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am by Alysha Stein-Manes
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]