Search for: "People v. House" Results 7961 - 7980 of 12,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The notion that joint or common owners of property cannot be charged with larceny is firmly rooted in common law as held in People v Zinke. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Callahan, however, the Seaberg opinion makes clear that a waiver of the right to appeal will not be enforced unless it was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:33 pm by davidmginsberg
Each week someone wins the “HOH” or “Head of House” and is the person who nominates the two people to be evicted. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:33 pm by davidmginsberg
Each week someone wins the “HOH” or “Head of House” and is the person who nominates the two people to be evicted. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
One piece of evidence from the 1976 House Report suggests that, though Congress didn’t think this through, it assumed that movies would count as derivative works with respect to songs without addressing the question of “derivative of what? [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:06 pm
 That's someone else too.Well, then, Maciel didn't do any of the actual shootings, but was among the people who barged into the house. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Jeffrey Vlasek
  We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Ken White
Most people accomplish this by writing about him and his actions and his words. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
--> Guest Post: Vasujith Ram Recently in Lily Thomas v Union of India, the Court held that Section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RPA) was ultra vires the Constitution. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 2:19 am by Tessa Shepperson
Guidance issued on the Superstrike case The four tenancy deposit companies issue guidance on the effect of the recent Superstrike v. [read post]