Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 33,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm
The state subsequently asserted a cross-claim against Jacobs for negligent design as successor-in-interest to the original engineer. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:14 am
I’m not saying that’s what happened here. [read post]
UPDATED: Lien Law Revisions Bill Cruises Through State Senate, Followed by “Hidden Lien” Legislation
28 Jun 2012, 5:30 am
The hidden lien legislation (Senate Bill 42), which among other things would require potential lien claimants to preserve their lien rights by providing a “Hi, I’m here” pre-notice to the project owner’s designated lien agent on residential and commercial projects, also passed unanimously 49-0, but not without some heartburn. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
(The opinions are announced in reverse order of seniority.)AND: Trinity Lutheran — the case I'm most interested in — is written by the Chief Justice. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:03 am
As you know, I'm a strong opponent to any sort of "tort reform" that blatantly cuts and manipulates any individual's rights to justice and fair compensation. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:49 pm
View the entire PDF article here MICHAEL M. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:41 am
Perhaps as interesting as the justice’s conclusion is the language that he used. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:35 am
” It looks like it’s oriented toward a business implementation of the LPD, but I’m hoping it will also provide a good overview of what it is and how it might be used in linked data projects going forward. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
It's actually a fairly interesting story. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:32 am
You know I’m bad. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
Authored by: Heather M. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
[Note: This is so long that it's likely to interest only those closely following the developing details of the Dominique Strauss-Kahn case.] [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
If private companies have to explain their practices to the state, and particularly how they moderate user speech, then, as my colleague Daphne Keller has observed on Lawfare before, that opens the door to political pressure to change those practices to better suit the state’s preferences. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 10:24 am
That's the crucial (and exceedingly interesting) point, IMO. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:42 pm
According to Meyers, the State had postulated "irrelevant grounds in order to persuade a majority of this court into granting review on an issue that seems interesting and important. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:09 pm
Show how it’s in their interests to agree to a mutually beneficial solution. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:30 am
I’m granting mother[’s] and father’s 388 as to C., finding there are changed circumstances and that it is in the child’s best interest to be returned to her parents. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:13 am
I’ve been to two of his LexThink conferences before and hope I can make this one (but may not be able to due to the timing (with IgniteBoise and state high school mock trial competitions the week before…I’m going to be hurting for family time)). [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Bently & M. [read post]
