Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 7961 - 7980 of 8,568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In its own separate March 18, 2015 press release (here), Potash Corp., which owns a 32 percent stake in SQM, stated that the Chilean prosecutor had made “serious allegations of wrongdoing” against SQM and its management, and that Potash’s board designees’ requests for full and voluntary cooperation “have been rejected by a majority of the Board. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am by Elizabeth Whatcott
” April 4: The Speaker of the Albanian Parliament Lindita Nikolla states: “The mass killings of innocent people in Bucha and other regions of Ukraine show that the violence of the Russian army is escalating into forms of genocide. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am by Beth S. Lyons
  The answer, in my view, is “no,” based largely on Rwanda’s State interference with the ICTR. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am by Frank Cranmer
John Picton, Modern Law Review: Lehtimäki v Cooper: Duty and Jurisdiction in Charity Law: on the UKSC judgment on the status of members of charitable companies. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Whether one is happy with the state of intellectual property law or not, it seems to have worked as advertised in this case. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Aker was sued in court over the remainder of the loan (USA v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Not long after that, she emailed the director stating she was making a formal accommodation request to attend medical appointments. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
  When de facto, the government's conduct and comments amount to an invitation to depart upwards, EDNY Judge Irizarry reiterates in a recent decision, holding that the government breached a plea agreement by disclosing highly inflammatory information about the defendant in its sentencing memorandum to the court.Adding to a spate of recent decisions yielding divergent views of the propriety of the government's conduct in plea bargaining and sentencing (see here, here and here),… [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
  If you have read Part I, you are familiar with the Court of Chancery's decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:27 pm by Ken
Certainly she doesn’t seem bright enough to be familiar with Hustler v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:10 pm by Ron Coleman
Co. v Google, Inc., 330 F.Supp.2d 700, 704-705 (E.D. [read post]