Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 7961 - 7980 of 85,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Dobbs argued that its use of state counting in 1868 to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment’s liberty guarantee provided an objective standard that prevented interpreters from reasoning from their values and so protected democracy in the states. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am by Claire Darwin, Matrix
This definition is lifted directly from Council Directive 98/59/EC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (the “Collective Redundancy Directive”). [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:58 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In response, the Respondent argued that it was lawful to impose the conditions because the Bail Order was legally defective and therefore void. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm by Cassie Rae
The problem with this, the petitioner argues, is that diversity is already considered and adjusted for via the state’s unique Top 10 Percent Law, and therefore the race-conscious admissions violate her right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:26 pm by Will Patton
The Washington Attorney General  will argue the case tomorrow on behalf of the State’s Secretary of State,  and urge the Supreme Court to affirm the Ninth Circuit ruling. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
This morning the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]