Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 26,700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 10:43 am
In an interesting recent unpublished decision, Flynn v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Applying the proposed new rule to these facts, the DOL concludes that the country club would be a joint employer of the landscaping contractor’s employees because the club “exercises sufficient control, both direct and indirect,” over the landscaper’s employees’ terms and conditions on what the DOL states “amounts to a regular basis,” pointing out that such control was further established by the fact that the country club… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm
The people of Los Angeles and cities across the country deserve safe streets. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
” A civil lawsuit was filed (Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm
This lawsuit, Innovation Lab v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
Here are the relevant materials in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
It is almost inconceivable that Huawei, a major Chinese telecommunications company with links to the Chinese party-state, would be able to refuse if the Chinese government ordered it to take actions that compromised other countries’ security, and there are no domestic constraints that would plausibly prevent the government from doing so. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
Kopf Senior United States District Jud [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:50 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
Will work with Member States. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
Here is the abstract: Ten years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its watershed decision in Carcieri v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:43 am
Reitman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
Part V assesses how NLHs and their host states affect each other, including hubs’ positive spillover effects and host state pushback. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 6:46 am
The court stated that, without sufficient details, it was impossible for the court to determine if the plaintiffs had adequately stated a cause of action, or if the alleged fraud should be excused. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
And, in other news from the FJC, check out the most recent addition to the Center's unit to our Famous Federal Trials series, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:11 pm
As one example of a sufficient “minimum contact,” the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in O’Connor v Sandy Lane Hotel that a Barbados hotel was subject to US jurisdiction where it “deliberately reached into” a state to target only “two of its citizens. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
The law enforcement agency settled in Raza v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
See Timbs v. [read post]
