Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 7961 - 7980 of 8,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2007, 12:46 am
Section 2115 of California General Corporation Law and Examen, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
” All rights in preferred stock provisions, even if considered standard or customary, must be “expressly and clearly stated. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 3:01 am
"  He states that: The Act protects only the legitimate economic interests of copyright holders. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
On July 23, 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada announced that that it will deliver its decision on Euro-Excellence, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
A recent example of such an opposite result is the case of Jim Wells County Appraisal District v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 10:47 pm
My guess is that YouTube is simply not happy with the state of their filtering software, and they don’t want to be legally obligated to spend money on human filtering of content. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:28 pm
Unilateral Refusals to License Patents The report begins with an analysis of unilateral refusals to license patents, focusing on two conflicting appellate decisions, Image Technical Services, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:49 am
As an agent, the trustee holds bare legal title.In 1993, the legislature added the definition of "owner" to the Section 189A:"Owner", any person who alone or jointly or severally with others (i) has legal title to any premises; (ii) has charge or control of any premises as an agent who has authority to expend money for compliance with the state sanitary code, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian of the estate or the holder of legal title; (iii) is an… [read post]