Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm
"For Indian tribes, state courts aren't allowed (as Justice Robie notes) to look at the tribal constitution or anything like that to interpret who's right and who's still in power. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 3:33 am
Gristede's Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:06 am
Even the Supreme Court has held in State of MP v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
[See also C-18/18 Glawischnig-Piesczek.]Online state surveillance The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), partially implemented in 2016 and 2017, is expected to come fully in force in 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Bill Olson – 1 Promoted Comment The United States government’s position in Arizona v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
For example, the state of the application should not be stored in the memory of your app instance, and services such as the datastore should be used to persist state. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: International Boundary Commission v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court's decision last week in Tapia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:21 pm
 In Grand Traverse County Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:42 am
Feed In Tariff: California CPUC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 3:59 pm
"Finally, at page 55 of his judgment, Judge Davis had held that none of the three factors in Soverain Software LLC v Amazon.com, Inc. pointed to a stay of proceedings pending reexamination by the USTPO of i4i's patent. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
[Emphasis added.]As stated more recently in Hryniak v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
The two prior decisions in this matter, addressing the issue of who should decide whether an agreement permits class arbitration, align well with the United States Supreme Court’s January 9, 2019 holding in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
To invoke this power, a litigant must have standing. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 3:59 pm
” Riegel v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 10:52 am
In McKinney v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Jarkesy — the power to preside over his case and issue the judgement. [read post]
