Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 7961 - 7980 of 57,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 7:40 pm by Tom Smith
“It would mean a majority to overrule Roe v Wade and to allow states to prohibit abortions, to eliminate all forms of affirmative action, to eliminate constitutional limits on illegal police conduct. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:01 am
cellphones.jpg Sixth Circuit reverses exclusion of statements of anonymous callers to the defendant's cell phone after his arrest; the statements were not offered not for the truth of what the anonymous callers said but for the fact that the calls were made, providing circumstantial evidence that the defendant was involved in heroin trafficking, in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by sally
” Full story The Guardian, 1st February 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk Related link: Full judgment: ZH (Tanzania) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:08 am by Linda Panszczyk
Brittex, not Dollar, was the first to use that mark in connection with pawn brokerage and pawn shop services, said the court, and the Board provided no support for the notion that a registrant has priority as to a specific service it was second to offer just because it was first to offer a different specific service (Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:30 am by Larry Tolchinsky
State, 147 So. 3d 34, 35 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); Bedford Computer Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
Tiffany's broad interpretation of Inwood, said the Court of Appeals, was not supported by the Supreme Court's dicta of the test in Sony Corp. v Universal (1984). [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:06 pm by Venkat
CareFliteAccessing an Employee's Facebook Posts by "Shoulder Surfing" a Coworker's Page States Privacy Claim -- Ehling v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:58 am by Jon Gelman
” Watson v 84 Lumber CP 2009-15740 (NJ DWC 2016) Decided: 12.15.2016“One of the primary benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act is that of medical benefits. [read post]