Search for: "State v. Thomas" Results 7961 - 7980 of 15,437
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 7:09 am
 While no opinion accompanied the order, the court noted that Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the decision. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:57 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court this evening issued an Order (full text) in Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:33 am
Justice Antonin Scalia issued a dissent, in which Justices Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined, from the denial of certiorari in Jones v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Jackson, Mississippi attorney Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/13/14: Hobby Lobby Implementation; Jumping the Gun on a Final Rule; Extended Waters of the United States; and EPA Rules to Watch – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 8:07 am
Thomas School of Law, is publishing The Conscience of a King: Law, Religion, and War in Shakespeare's King Henry V in the Journal of Catholic Legal Studies (2014). [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
Recall that William Marbury sued because President Thomas Jefferson and Secretary of State James Madison denied him a commission for a judgeship to which he was appointed by President John Adams and confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:17 pm by NBlack
Magistrate judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, Thomas Rawles Jones Jr., issued an order in Whoshere, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:20 am by Ronald Mann
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times Tuesday morning when the Court heard arguments in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:22 am by Patricia McConnico
Thomas Jefferson, to ask him what he thought of the effects of the Marbury v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:05 am by Jordan Bublick
 §1 (interesting states that "insane" includes "every idiot, insane person, and person non compos mentis")"Designed Quickly" - that is whether the taxpayer quickly designed to place property beyond the reach of the government, Fumo v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, dissenting in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]