Search for: "State v. Waite"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 10,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2013, 12:08 pm
This is my second post today on Wednesday's filings in the Microsoft v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am
So, for the moment, we wait to see how filings continue to develop and how the wording in those new specifications is eventually tested before courts and tribunals to determine the relevant scope of protection (but more on that later). [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm
State Grange v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:37 pm
See Bennett v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:34 am
Gray v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
” The Court notably took a similar approach last month in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
Sackett v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
Va. 2009) and Vitatoe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:56 am
(or wait until a member of congress get caught in an FBAR scandal. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 6:50 pm
Brown, which concerns Maryland's ban on semiautomatic rifles, and Ocean State Tactical v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am
and Auer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
§ 1983 fails to state explicitly that punitive damages can be awarded. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Dixon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 12:23 pm
But, she waited almost as long to see whether she was even a real party in interest. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:00 am
United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]