Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7961 - 7980 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am by Dennis Crouch
The Thompson decision was released on January 1, 1826 and penned by Judge Van Ness who died later that year. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In contrast, I stopped smoking weed when I began enforcing anti- drug laws, not based on any abstract concern about hypocrisy but because my employer, the United States Department of Justice, required random drug testing of its staff.I resumed my acquaintance with recreational drugs when I started law teaching, which some people would say explains a lot. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that it is unconstitutional to execute insane people who cannot understand why they are being put to death or that their execution is imminent. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Eight Amendment Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
Millett, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of respondent. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:52 pm
United States, which has been filed with the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights by the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, for which I am Deputy Director. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:22 pm
What was the original complaint and what were the petitioners asking of the state of California? [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:12 am by Paul F. Prestia
Currently, prior art is impliedly defined as information: • Known in the United States (information “known or used by others in this country”). [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Bordi reviewed Minor's attendance record, and there was no indication of any out-of-state travel.Officer Hopwood testified he responded to the school on the report of a student with a firearm, and in the principal's office he took custody of the confiscated firearm and magazine cartridge. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am by Law Lady
CARLOS SOSA, Appellee. 3rd District.Contracts -- Condominium sale -- Preconstruction agreement -- Action arising out of buyer's refusal to close due to seller's failure to complete the condominium within two years of the contract as provided by the contract -- Trial court properly found breach of contract by buyer where, although court erred in determining that the unit could be permissibly conveyed on date permitted in the contract pursuant to 718.104(4)(e), purchase contract… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Article 7(2) states that “[a] person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State . [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
Stoneridge Investment Partners was the petitioner when the case reached the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by Law Lady
MOTION, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee. 3rd District.Contracts -- Subscription and purchase agreement governing construction and closing of condominium unit -- Trial court erred in finding that developer complied with contract provision requiring timely completion and delivery of unit within two years of date of agreement based on finding that certificate of occupancy, which was issued within two-year period, signaled completion of unit -- Interplay between contract… [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:06 pm
  At the Board's request, the NMB considered the record in this case and issued an opinion stating that in its view the Employer is a carrier subject to the RLA. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 11:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
  New § 2256(b) “reaffirms that the United States is in an armed conflict with the Taliban, al Qaeda, and associated forces and that those entities continue to pose a threat to the United States and its citizens, both domestically and abroad. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
BRETT ALLEN PARNELL, Appellee. 5th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Injunction for protection against domestic violence -- Jurisdiction -- Domiciliary of state -- Trial court did not err in determining that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over wife's dissolution of marriage petition because wife, who was in United States on non-immigrant tourist visa, had not established actual residency with an intent to remain permanently in state -- Contrary to… [read post]