Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 7961 - 7980 of 8,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2008, 7:58 pm
The Appellate Division heard three hours of arguments from the assembled attorneys representing Long Branch property owners and the city of Long Branch. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:44 am
  The Supreme Court upheld the state's right to condemn and take the land upon payment of just compensation in Kelo v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:56 pm
A few weeks ago I shocked the world -- okay, surprised a few people -- by pointing out United States v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:19 am
The episode aired just six days after the real court heard arguments in Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:55 pm
The Supreme Court has granted a petition, signed by the Solicitor General and several high-profile lawyers in the US Departments of State, Commerce, and Energy, to review the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:02 am
On 22 April 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Giles v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:09 pm
  More documents are at the bottom of this page: [www.scotusblog.com] Here's my question:  Was the uranium in question subject to normal tariff duties when it was entered into the United States after enrichment? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
He would have been there while still an employee of the taxpayers of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
" Hawk advertised heavily all over the southeastern United States, including on billboards right outside the BellSouth headquarters, and it was driving BellSouth crazy. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:33 am
United States, it seems the government had decided that it agreed with plaintiff Michael Greenlaw on the main sentencing-related issue in the case. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:29 pm
Hamdan’s commission remain unanswered — including whether the Constitution of the United States imposes any constraint whatsoever on these trials,” his lawyers contended. [read post]